1. Ask specific clarifying questions: "Could you point to which specific part of the authentication logic concerns you?". Rather than: "Can you explain your feedback more?" 2. Propose concrete solutions. Share 2-3 potential fixes and ask which better addresses their concern. 3. Restate your understanding: "It sounds like you're concerned about the error handling being too generic. Is that accurate?" 4. Request examples. Ask for examples of code that better demonstrates what they're looking for. 5. Schedule a quick sync. If written communication isn't clearing things up, suggest a 15-minute call.

Ask for Clarification – Politely request specific examples or details from the reviewer. Identify Patterns – Look for recurring themes in feedback across multiple reviews. Check Best Practices – Compare feedback with coding standards and industry best practices. Use Peer Discussions – Discuss with teammates or mentors for alternative perspectives. Improve Documentation – Add comments or refactor code to enhance clarity and maintainability.

1. Ask for Clarification – I directly reach out to the reviewer, either through comments or a quick discussion, to understand their specific concerns. Asking "Could you clarify what you mean by this?" or "Are you referring to performance, readability, or maintainability?" helps it to sort out. 2. Provide Context – If the feedback seems ambiguous, I explain my thought process behind the implementation. Sometimes, misunderstandings arise due to a lack of background on why a certain approach was taken. Checking relevant documentation or guidelines can also help. 3. Learn from Past Reviews – If similar feedback has come up before, I look at past revisions to understand the reviewer’s preferences and ensure my code aligns with team standards.

Vague feedback in a code review is like getting a restaurant review that just says “interesting.” Here’s how to decode and respond effectively: 1️⃣ Seek clarification – Ask direct questions like, “Can you specify which part needs improvement?” No mind-reading required. 2️⃣ Provide context – Explain why you took a certain approach—sometimes, reviewers just need the backstory. 3️⃣ Suggest improvements – Show initiative by offering solutions instead of waiting for a rewrite request. And if all else fails… just remind them that “it works on my machine” isn’t a bug fix strategy.

To handle vague feedback during a code review, follow these steps: 1. Seek Clarification – Ask the reviewer specific questions like, "Could you provide an example?" or "Do you mean improving readability or logic?" 2. Identify Patterns – Look for recurring comments that hint at broader concerns, such as performance or code structure. 3. Refer to Coding Standards – Cross-check feedback against best practices to interpret possible improvements. 4. Use Peer Discussion – Discuss with teammates to get different perspectives on the feedback. 5. Suggest Solutions – Propose changes and ask for confirmation to ensure alignment with the reviewer's intent.