More than features, it matters if these decisions are easily reversible. If they are - I would always go for short-term features. If not, will optimize for tech-debts.

1. Prioritize features that bring immediate value aligning with the long-term goals. 2. Address high-impact tech debt in critical areas and allocate time for refactoring alongside new development. Focusing on both - new features and tech debt is equally important as one ensures business growth and the other ensures its sanity.

🎯𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆: Focus on features that align with long-term goals and minimize tech debt. 🔄𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝗗𝗲𝗯𝘁 𝗦𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀: Dedicate specific sprints or time blocks to address existing tech debt. 🗣️𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲-𝗼𝗳𝗳𝘀: Clearly explain the consequences of ignoring tech debt to stakeholders. 🤖𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 & 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴: Implement tools to streamline code improvements. 🛠️𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴: Refactored small sections of code during feature development. 🔑𝗞𝗲𝘆: Prioritize, allocate time, communicate, automate, refactor incrementally.

"Sometimes you have to take a step back to move forward." Balancing short-term features and long-term tech debt? Balance the seesaw, and you’ll win in both the short and long run. Here’s how to keep it steady: Assess Impact: Weigh short-term benefits vs. long-term costs. Plan Ahead: Make room for addressing tech debt while building features. Set Priorities: Focus on key features but don’t neglect the debt. Communicate: Ensure the team understands the trade-offs. Test & Iterate: Implement quickly, refine over time. Make the Call: Think long-term for better foundations.

Short answer: 'Priorizie ruthlessly'. Deliver features that align with business goals but reserve time for cleanup. Communicate trade-offs with stakeholders - help them see why quick wins today shouldn’t hurt scalability tomorrow. Leverage tools to track debt metrics and make informed decisions. That way, you’re set to win both the short-term and the long-term game!