1. Frame the discussion around project constraints and objectives first. Have team members articulate specific technical requirements and timeline impacts. 2. Create a decision matrix. 3. Set a strict timeboxed discussion (30-60 min) to review options objectively. Each advocate gets equal time to present their case. 4. If consensus isn't reached, empower the technical lead to make the final call, focusing on what best serves immediate project needs while maintaining reasonable technical debt levels. 5. Document the decision and rationale to maintain alignment and provide context for future discussions.

Acknowledge Concerns – Listen to each team's rationale for their preferred tech stack to understand key concerns. Focus on Project Goals – Align decisions with business objectives, timeline, and resource availability. Leverage Expertise & Data – Use past project insights, benchmarks, and expert input to make an informed choice. Find a Middle Ground – If feasible, integrate compatible technologies or phase out decisions pragmatically. Decide & Align Quickly – Ensure buy-in, set clear responsibilities, and move forward decisively to meet deadlines.

Assess Requirements – Focus on project needs over personal preferences. Facilitate Discussion – Encourage open dialogue to understand each viewpoint. Prioritize Feasibility – Choose a stack that balances speed, stability, and scalability. Leverage Expertise – Assign decisions to those with relevant experience. Settle on a Compromise – Use hybrid solutions if necessary to meet deadlines. Align with the Goal – Keep the team focused on delivering results efficiently.

I’d start by listening—really listening—to everyone’s concerns. A tech stack choice isn’t just about the code; it’s about the people building it. I’d bring the team together, focus on what works best given our deadline, and remind everyone that we’re on the same side. If there’s tension, I’d suggest a quick prototype to test options instead of endless debates. At the end of the day, it’s about delivering a solid app and keeping the team motivated. No ego, just solutions.

Tech stack debates in crunch time? That’s basically a nerdy battle royale. Best move—skip the egos, lay out the facts, and pick what gets the job done now, not in some utopian dev fantasy. If it works, ships fast, and doesn’t make the backend cry, it wins. Worst case? Flip a coin and blame fate.